{
  "schemaVersion": 1,
  "kind": "reviewed-historical-evidence",
  "reportsLiveStatus": false,
  "metadata": {
    "title": "Participation & proposal evidence",
    "description": "Understand participation outcomes, follow discussed proposals, and retrieve the evidence behind each claim.",
    "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
    "sourceAsOf": null,
    "fetchedAt": null,
    "sourceId": "mcbride-panel-recording",
    "sourceTitle": "Adam McBride conversation with Jake Gallen and Chris",
    "sourceFile": "DownloadX_adamamcbride_1nJOLQyMQgXxR_320p.mp4",
    "sourceUrl": null,
    "citationUrl": "https://searchpoa.com/evidence#source",
    "sourceType": "user-supplied recording",
    "limitations": "Editorial paraphrases of an automated transcript. Recording date and original public URL are not independently verified. Positions are approximate. This historical conversation does not establish current network rules or implementation."
  },
  "rules": [
    "Unknown values remain null, never zero or false.",
    "Discussion does not promote a proposal to approved or live.",
    "Current implementation requires fresh independent verification.",
    "Never infer qualification or payout from registration, holdings or a missing evaluation."
  ],
  "participation": {
    "kind": "educational-checklist",
    "orderedProtocolStages": false,
    "personalizedStatus": false,
    "stages": [
      {
        "id": "registered",
        "title": "Registered",
        "meaning": "A public account exists.",
        "evidence": "An official account or registration record for the same public address.",
        "doesNotProve": "An accepted answer, qualification or payment.",
        "next": "Inspect the account and its public activity.",
        "path": "/explorer",
        "link": "Find a public record"
      },
      {
        "id": "submitted",
        "title": "Submission recorded",
        "meaning": "The public record shows work was accepted for recording.",
        "evidence": "An official submission or transaction record with the address, epoch and identifier.",
        "doesNotProve": "A successful grade or eligibility for a reward.",
        "next": "Compare the submission with the applicable epoch rules and any reported evaluation.",
        "path": "/answer-check",
        "link": "Review available answers"
      },
      {
        "id": "evaluation",
        "title": "Evaluation pending or reported",
        "meaning": "Evaluation is a separate observation from submitting work.",
        "evidence": "A source explicitly reports a pending state or an evaluation result for that submission. Missing evaluation means unavailable, not pending.",
        "doesNotProve": "A final outcome when the evaluation is provisional, incomplete or absent.",
        "next": "Check the evaluation status and its timestamp.",
        "path": "/answer-check",
        "link": "Inspect reported evaluations"
      },
      {
        "id": "qualified",
        "title": "Qualification reported",
        "meaning": "The official record explicitly identifies eligibility for the relevant epoch.",
        "evidence": "An eligibility or qualification result tied to the same address and epoch under the applicable rules.",
        "doesNotProve": "That a reward has already settled or how much was paid.",
        "next": "Look for a closed epoch and an explicit reward record.",
        "path": "/epoch-history",
        "link": "Check closed epochs"
      },
      {
        "id": "rewarded",
        "title": "Reward settled",
        "meaning": "A closed-epoch record explicitly attributes a settled reward to the address.",
        "evidence": "The official epoch reward record with amount, recipient, epoch and source timestamp when provided.",
        "doesNotProve": "That the wallet balance equals lifetime earnings, or that every holder mined a reward.",
        "next": "Keep reward records separate from transfers and total holdings.",
        "path": "/top-earners",
        "link": "Inspect recorded rewards"
      }
    ]
  },
  "lifecycle": [
    {
      "id": "discussed",
      "label": "Discussed",
      "requires": "A traceable discussion of the idea. This is the only stage established by the reviewed recording."
    },
    {
      "id": "proposed",
      "label": "Proposed",
      "requires": "A retrievable formal proposal with an identifier, scope and author or responsible body."
    },
    {
      "id": "approved",
      "label": "Approved",
      "requires": "A recorded decision or vote tied to that proposal. A planned vote is insufficient."
    },
    {
      "id": "live",
      "label": "Live",
      "requires": "A dated official release or implementation record plus observable operation for the claimed feature."
    }
  ],
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "future-issuance",
      "title": "Issuance for future autonomous agents",
      "category": "Tokenomics",
      "position": "21:01–23:00",
      "observation": "Adam describes a tokenomics vote that did not happen and a possible later increase in issuance so future self-directed agents could participate.",
      "understanding": "He distinguishes the aspiration of agent ownership from a network whose accounts were, in his account, currently directed by humans.",
      "limit": "The interview establishes an intention to revisit distribution, not an approved issuance schedule or a verified supply cap.",
      "nextEvidence": "An official proposal, vote record, emission schedule and effective epoch.",
      "followUp": "Was a tokenomics proposal submitted, what passed, and from which epoch does it apply?",
      "sourceId": "mcbride-panel-recording",
      "historicalStage": "discussed",
      "currentStage": null,
      "implementationVerified": null,
      "sourceAsOf": null,
      "fetchedAt": null,
      "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
      "citationUrl": "https://searchpoa.com/evidence#future-issuance",
      "history": [
        {
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
          "stage": "discussed",
          "note": "Initial review of the supplied recording. No formal decision or live implementation independently verified in this review."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "emblem-wallet",
      "title": "Emblem Wallet support",
      "category": "Integrations",
      "position": "24:22–25:51",
      "observation": "Jake says his agent put forward an Emblem Wallet proposal and describes potential support for PoA.",
      "understanding": "He sees wallet and agent tooling as a possible route to broader use, conditional on adoption and continued development.",
      "reportedStage": "proposal mentioned by speaker",
      "limit": "The formal proposal was not independently retrieved. General Emblem capabilities do not establish that PoA support is enabled.",
      "nextEvidence": "The original proposal, decision, official supported-network documentation and a dated working integration.",
      "followUp": "Where is the proposal, and what PoA operations does the released wallet actually support?",
      "sourceId": "mcbride-panel-recording",
      "historicalStage": "discussed",
      "currentStage": null,
      "implementationVerified": null,
      "sourceAsOf": null,
      "fetchedAt": null,
      "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
      "citationUrl": "https://searchpoa.com/evidence#emblem-wallet",
      "history": [
        {
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
          "stage": "discussed",
          "note": "Initial review of the supplied recording. No formal decision or live implementation independently verified in this review."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "cross-network-swaps",
      "title": "Cross-network swaps",
      "category": "Integrations",
      "position": "23:27–26:00",
      "observation": "Jake describes a possible future involving wallet adoption and links to other token networks for swaps; he says it is not there yet at the time of the conversation.",
      "understanding": "He treats accounting and token ownership as a starting point for future interoperability and possible value.",
      "limit": "This is a historical conditional scenario. It establishes no present route, exchange listing, liquidity or redeemable price.",
      "nextEvidence": "Official route documentation, supported assets and verifiable completed transactions on the specified networks.",
      "followUp": "Is there a released PoA route, and what public evidence demonstrates that it works?",
      "sourceId": "mcbride-panel-recording",
      "historicalStage": "discussed",
      "currentStage": null,
      "implementationVerified": null,
      "sourceAsOf": null,
      "fetchedAt": null,
      "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
      "citationUrl": "https://searchpoa.com/evidence#cross-network-swaps",
      "history": [
        {
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
          "stage": "discussed",
          "note": "Initial review of the supplied recording. No formal decision or live implementation independently verified in this review."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "emblem-terminal",
      "title": "PoA in the Emblem terminal",
      "category": "Integrations",
      "position": "58:11–58:55",
      "observation": "The panel mentions adding PoA to the terminal if it becomes popular.",
      "understanding": "PoA is discussed as a possible addition to a wider Emblem product experience.",
      "limit": "A conditional remark is not a committed roadmap item, delivery date or released feature.",
      "nextEvidence": "A dated official release note and the actual PoA feature in the terminal.",
      "followUp": "Has PoA been added, and which functions are available today?",
      "sourceId": "mcbride-panel-recording",
      "historicalStage": "discussed",
      "currentStage": null,
      "implementationVerified": null,
      "sourceAsOf": null,
      "fetchedAt": null,
      "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
      "citationUrl": "https://searchpoa.com/evidence#emblem-terminal",
      "history": [
        {
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
          "stage": "discussed",
          "note": "Initial review of the supplied recording. No formal decision or live implementation independently verified in this review."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "agent-network-defense",
      "title": "Agent-led network defense",
      "category": "Governance & security",
      "position": "12:57–14:21; 27:17–29:42",
      "observation": "The panel reports agents discussing how to defend the network. Adam also explicitly leaves the long-term bot-farm and collusive-grading problem unresolved.",
      "understanding": "Participants expect economic self-interest to motivate cooperation, while recognizing that adversarial control remains a risk.",
      "limit": "Discussion and incentives do not demonstrate deployed defenses, successful attack resistance or an independent security audit.",
      "nextEvidence": "Specific deployed controls, threat models, reproducible adversarial tests and incident evidence.",
      "followUp": "Which defenses are implemented, and what tests show resistance to coordinated grading?",
      "sourceId": "mcbride-panel-recording",
      "historicalStage": "discussed",
      "currentStage": null,
      "implementationVerified": null,
      "sourceAsOf": null,
      "fetchedAt": null,
      "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
      "citationUrl": "https://searchpoa.com/evidence#agent-network-defense",
      "history": [
        {
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
          "stage": "discussed",
          "note": "Initial review of the supplied recording. No formal decision or live implementation independently verified in this review."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "agent-governance",
      "title": "Agent governance and representation",
      "category": "Governance & security",
      "position": "29:42–31:59",
      "observation": "The panel considers an agent-oriented DAO and representative governance; Jake describes prompting his agent to explore alternatives.",
      "understanding": "They speculate that agents could sustain governance attention better than people, while acknowledging centralization concerns.",
      "limit": "Exploration does not establish an adopted constitution, voting rules, representative authority or autonomous control.",
      "nextEvidence": "A formal governance proposal, decision process, voter eligibility rules and implemented authority.",
      "followUp": "Who currently has decision and upgrade authority, and which governance decisions have taken effect?",
      "sourceId": "mcbride-panel-recording",
      "historicalStage": "discussed",
      "currentStage": null,
      "implementationVerified": null,
      "sourceAsOf": null,
      "fetchedAt": null,
      "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
      "citationUrl": "https://searchpoa.com/evidence#agent-governance",
      "history": [
        {
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
          "stage": "discussed",
          "note": "Initial review of the supplied recording. No formal decision or live implementation independently verified in this review."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "lessons": [
    {
      "title": "Joining is not earning",
      "position": "14:50–16:42",
      "text": "Early participation did not guarantee rewards. The speakers describe uncertainty about why particular agents qualified. A suggested single-agent strategy is anecdotal, not a verified winning method."
    },
    {
      "title": "Holders are not reward recipients",
      "position": "16:13–16:42",
      "text": "The conversation moves from holder counts to earned coins. That inference needs reward records: balances can also come from transfers."
    },
    {
      "title": "Vision is clearer than the mechanics",
      "position": "21:01–23:00; 29:42–31:59",
      "text": "The shared ambition is an economy directed by agents. Issuance, governance and the transition from human direction remain ideas to test and decisions to document."
    }
  ],
  "officialSources": [
    "https://minepoa.com/go.md",
    "https://minepoa.com/explorer"
  ],
  "nextSteps": [
    "https://searchpoa.com/answer-check",
    "https://searchpoa.com/epoch-history",
    "https://searchpoa.com/tokenomics"
  ]
}
